Thursday, 13 August 2026
Exploration desk · mixed view

White Gold's Yukon study: a C$1.91 billion net present value, and the assumptions holding it up

A preliminary economic assessment is the most flattering study a developer will ever publish. That does not make this one wrong, but it does set the reading standard.

Filed by
Andres KarlssonResource Geologist, Exploration Desk
Published
Reading
7 min
Section 01

The headline numbers

White Gold Corp has reported the first preliminary economic assessment for its White Gold project in the Yukon, outlining a 9.4-year open-pit operation producing roughly 188,000 ounces of gold a year, with a net present value stated at C$1.91 billion.

The company is drilling between 15,000 and 20,000 metres this year with three rigs, focused on extending known mineralised zones rather than testing new ground. That is a resource-conversion programme, which is the correct priority once a study exists.

At the study's implied scale, this is a mid-tier asset rather than a marginal one. The question is what price and cost assumptions carry the valuation.

Section 02

How to read a preliminary economic assessment

A study at this level may include inferred resources, which are not demonstrated to be economically mineable. It is not a reserve statement, and the accuracy band on capital and operating costs is wide, conventionally around plus or minus thirty per cent.

Net present value at a high gold price is highly geared. A study written near cycle-high metal prices will show a headline figure that compresses quickly if the price assumption is normalised, and the sensitivity table matters more than the summary page.

Yukon-specific costs are the other input to interrogate: seasonal access, camp logistics, power, and the length of the territorial and First Nations permitting path.

That is a resource-conversion programme, which is the correct priority once a study exists.
Analyst note · Exploration desk
Section 03

The bear case

Yukon open pits have historically struggled with strip ratio and winter operating cost rather than with grade. Any deterioration in the strip assumption at feasibility stage tends to move the economics more than a modest grade revision.

Permitting and consultation timelines in the territory have lengthened, and a 9.4-year mine life leaves limited room to absorb a multi-year delay before the study is superseded by a different cost environment.

There is also the financing question. A project of this capital intensity, in a jurisdiction with a short construction season, is not fundable on a preliminary study alone.

Section 04

What we would need to see

Conversion of a meaningful share of inferred material to indicated, a pre-feasibility study with a defensible strip ratio, and clarity on the permitting route with affected First Nations.

The constructive read is that the Yukon now has a second credible district-scale gold development story, and that the drilling programme is aimed at the right target: mine life rather than headlines.

Quick answers
How much gold would the White Gold project produce?
The preliminary economic assessment outlines roughly 188,000 ounces a year over a 9.4-year open-pit mine life, with a stated net present value of C$1.91 billion.
Is a preliminary economic assessment the same as a reserve?
No. It is an early-stage study that may include inferred resources and carries a wide cost accuracy band. Reserves are only declared at feasibility stage.
Sources and further reading
More from AurumPivot