Tuesday, 11 August 2026
Governance · Mixed

Regional certification and the Kampala chain of custody

Tin, tantalum and tungsten are bulky and traceable. Gold is neither, and every certification scheme in the region was built for the former.

By Nadia FerreiroLead Editor, Emerging Markets Desk6 min read

The design mismatch

Regional certification mechanisms in the Great Lakes were built around minerals that move in sacks and containers, where tagging at the pit and reconciliation at the border is workable. Gold is dense, high value and easily concealed, and a year's artisanal output from a district fits in a briefcase.

Where the schemes still bite

Certification retains force at the buyer end. Refiners on international good-delivery lists apply their own due diligence, and losing accreditation is commercially fatal. The practical chain of custody is therefore enforced by London and Zurich, not by the border post.

Implication for Ugandan operators

Producers who intend to sell into accredited channels should build documentation to the standard those refiners audit against, and should assume that standard tightens rather than relaxes. Operators selling into unaccredited channels are accepting a discount whether or not it appears in the contract.

Sources
More from AurumPivot